Must be hardship loving Russians, what else? Well, then explain why in countries like Russia, where people prefer to buy hardware without an OS, even laptops, and can- the OS later installed on that hardware is Windows. No wonder, why.įrom the other hand, Linux can’t make a dent at Microsoft revenues, for the last 5 years. If you have read the article, Linux replaces UNIX. >MS cannot touch linux on any of these points.Īpparently, users are looking for something different. As more people start using it, that will get steadily more difficult. Now tell us why he is wrong, and why Windows costs less, is more scalable, more secure(!) and more reliable without silly Microsoft sponsored Gartner reports. Go find another bench to sit on, because you are in the water boys way nimrod. When someone proposes Linux change for the better, it is misguided idiots just like you that stand in the way screaming that Linux is perfect and nothing needs to be changed. The answer is yes, and no amount of hearsay around the periphery makes a blind bit of difference. The acid test is whether it gets things done. The fact that so many pro-Linux people are exactly like you is, if anything, reason to question whether Linux is really a better solution or if it just carries more hype. I am not going to argue that Linux is not a viable solution because it is, but like most Linux cheerleaders, you have discredited your opinion as just another anti-MS advocate spouting anything they think will damage MS. You use the word FUD to describe MS and declare Linux is ready for the desktop and easier to use?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |